SOLUTIONS
Automotive cybersecurity engineering workflows
Five use-case workflows — from architecture-aware TARA to post-production vulnerability monitoring — each designed to support reviewable engineering evidence with engineer-in-the- loop review.
ONE EVIDENCE CHAIN, FIVE USE CASES
Each solution below is a specific automotive cybersecurity engineering workflow. They share one underlying evidence chain — architecture context to TARA, attack paths, controls, and reviewable work products — applied to a particular buyer problem.
FIVE SOLUTION WORKFLOWS
Pick the workflow that matches the problem
SOLUTION 01
Automotive TARA
Architecture-aware TARA for ISO/SAE 21434 Clause 15 — assets through risk treatment.
Explore Automotive TARA→
SOLUTION 02
CSMS Evidence
CSMS work products and engineering evidence for UNECE R155 readiness.
Explore CSMS Evidence→
SOLUTION 03
Attack Path Review
Multi-hop attack paths, feasibility review, and risk-treatment linkage.
Explore Attack Path Review→
SOLUTION 04
OTA & SUMS Readiness
SUMS evidence for UNECE R156 — update authorisation, dependency analysis, RxSWIN.
Explore OTA & SUMS Readiness→
SOLUTION 05
SBOM & Vulnerability Monitoring
Vulnerability-to-architecture context and prioritisation for post-production monitoring.
Explore SBOM & Vulnerability Monitoring→
EXPLORE NEXT
Compliance, trust, proof, and engagement
The solution workflows connect to the compliance standards they support, the trust posture procurement reviews, and the engagement packages that scope the work.
Not sure which workflow fits? Bring the programme.
A scoped demo on a representative architecture shows which workflow fits, what KAVACH covers cleanly, and where engineering services close the gap.