SOLUTIONS · CSMS EVIDENCE
CSMS evidence for UNECE R155 readiness
Connect Cybersecurity Management System governance to the engineering evidence chain — Cybersecurity Case work products, supplier evidence, and UNECE R155 readiness.
WHO THIS PAGE IS FOR
This page is for OEM cybersecurity leads, CSMS owners, and programme managers responsible for Cybersecurity Management System evidence and UNECE R155 readiness.
THE PROBLEM
UNECE R155 requires OEMs to operate a documented, audited Cybersecurity Management System and to demonstrate that cybersecurity is engineered into the vehicle. The CSMS is governance; the evidence is engineering. When the two are managed separately, the evidence is reconstructed under audit pressure instead of generated during engineering.
WHERE THE MANUAL WORKFLOW STRUGGLES
Why spreadsheets stop scaling
Audit dates land before the documentation chain is fully assembled
Governance documents and engineering work products live in different systems and drift apart
Supplier-side evidence is fragmented across spreadsheets and document handoffs
Annex 5 threat coverage is interpreted differently across teams
Translating engineering work into assessment-authority language happens late and by hand
HOW AGNILE AND KAVACH HELP
An engineering workflow designed to support this
KAVACH structures engineering evidence so it maps to CSMS and UNECE R155 evidence expectations
Cybersecurity case assembly draws on evidence generated across the cybersecurity lifecycle
Cybersecurity Interface Agreement workflows keep OEM and supplier evidence connected
A curated automotive Threat Database supports consistent Annex 5 threat coverage
Agnile engineering services support CSMS readiness reviews and pre-assessment gap analysis
REQUIRED INPUTS
- CSMS process documentation and governance scope
- Programme architecture and asset scope
- Supplier scope and Interface Agreement context
EXPECTED OUTPUTS
- CSMS-aligned engineering work-product evidence
- Cybersecurity Case structured for review
- Cybersecurity Interface Agreement records
- Readiness gap analysis against UNECE R155 expectations
Actual programme outputs depend on scope, architecture, and the engineering review process.
RELATED PAGES
Where to go next
COMPLIANCE
PROOF & WORKFLOW
FAQ
CSMS Evidence FAQ
See the CSMS Evidence workflow on your own architecture.
Bring a representative ECU, feature, or system architecture. We'll walk through how the workflow is structured — with honest answers on fit and integration effort.