FOR · OEM CYBERSECURITY LEADS
From vehicle architecture to audit-ready cybersecurity evidence
Connect architecture context, TARA, attack paths, controls, and Cybersecurity Case work products in one reviewable workspace — without exposing programme data to public AI services.
WHO THIS PAGE IS FOR
This page is for OEM cybersecurity leads, CSMS owners, and platform-cybersecurity managers responsible for cybersecurity evidence across one or more vehicle programmes.
OWNS DECISIONS FOR
What lands on this desk
- CSMS readiness and UNECE R155 evidence
- Cross-programme TARA consistency
- Cybersecurity Case assembly
- Supplier evidence interfaces
BUYER PAIN
Where the friction shows up
CSMS audit dates land before the documentation chain is fully assembled — evidence gets reconstructed instead of generated
TARA outputs drift across programmes — each team interprets ratings, threats, and treatment differently
Supplier Cybersecurity Interface Agreements lag behind real engineering decisions
Annex 5 threat coverage is fragmented across spreadsheets, supplier docs, and internal slide decks
Translating engineering work into assessment-authority language is brittle and happens late
Vulnerability response across the fleet does not connect cleanly back to original TARA decisions
WHAT YOU NEED TO PROVE
The evidence chain stakeholders expect
- 01
A documented Cybersecurity Management System covering processes, roles, and governance
- 02
Evidence that cybersecurity is engineered into vehicles, not retrofitted
- 03
Coverage of UNECE R155 Annex 5 threat categories mapped to the vehicle architecture
- 04
Cybersecurity Interface Agreements with named suppliers
- 05
Cybersecurity Case structured for review by the assessment authority
- 06
Post-production vulnerability response and incident-handling evidence
HOW AGNILE HELPS
Engineering teams who do this work day-to-day
CSMS readiness reviews — gap analysis against UNECE R155 and ISO/SAE 21434 work-product expectations
Cross-programme TARA workflows that keep ratings and methods consistent across vehicle platforms
Cybersecurity Case structuring with engineering evidence assembled across the lifecycle
Supplier coordination support — Interface Agreement workflows, supplier-side gap reviews
Engineering team extension for cybersecurity work-product delivery on the customer programme
HOW KAVACH SUPPORTS THE WORKFLOW
The workspace built around this evidence chain
Architecture-aware TARA at programme scale — assets, threats, attack paths, and controls in one connected model across ECU families
Curated automotive Threat Database covers UNECE R155 Annex 5 categories so coverage converges across teams
Cybersecurity Case assembly drawing on evidence generated across the cybersecurity lifecycle
Cybersecurity Interface Agreement workflows so OEM-supplier evidence stays connected
Engineer-in-the-loop review with deterministic outputs and AI-assisted acceleration that can be configured or disabled per programme
RELATED PAGES
Where to go next
SERVICES & PRODUCT
Engagement paths
FAQ
Questions oem cybersecurity leads typically ask
Bring a programme. We'll show where the evidence chain holds and where it doesn't.
Sixty-minute working session on a representative architecture. Honest answers on what KAVACH covers cleanly and where engineering services close the gap.